1963 MG 1100 vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1963 MG 1100 | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | MG | Holden |
Model | 1100 | Colorado |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 83 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |