1963 NSU 1000 C vs. 2012 Honda Civic
To start off, 2012 Honda Civic is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda Civic (148 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C.
Because 1963 NSU 1000 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 NSU 1000 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda Civic (350 Nm) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm). This means 2012 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C.
Compare all specifications:
1963 NSU 1000 C | 2012 Honda Civic | |
Make | NSU | Honda |
Model | 1000 C | Civic |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 996 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 69 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |