1963 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (206 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1963 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1963 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 1963 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Plymouth Valiant | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Plymouth | Volvo |
Model | Valiant | C70 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2789 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2650 mm |