1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 120 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Pontiac Tempest | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Pontiac | Renault |
Model | Tempest | Clio |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3524 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2580 mm |