1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2013 Nissan Juke. (185 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2013 Nissan Juke. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Juke weights approximately 20 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Because 2013 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Pontiac Tempest | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Pontiac | Nissan |
Model | Tempest | Juke |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6376 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1765 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2530 mm |