1963 Seat 1500 vs. 2010 Lotus Exige
To start off, 2010 Lotus Exige is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Lotus Exige is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lotus Exige (425 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 354 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lotus Exige should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lotus Exige weights approximately 831 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Seat 1500 | 2010 Lotus Exige | |
Make | Seat | Lotus |
Model | 1500 | Exige |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1991 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5098 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3063 mm |