1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2000 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 2000 Seat Alhambra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,780 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Alhambra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Alhambra (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Alhambra should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Alhambra (214 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2000 Seat Alhambra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2000 Seat Alhambra | |
| Make | Suzuki | Seat |
| Model | Fronte | Alhambra |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 1780 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 214 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2850 mm |
