1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2005 Ford Lynx
To start off, 2005 Ford Lynx is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Lynx (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Lynx should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Lynx weights approximately 610 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Lynx (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2005 Ford Lynx | |
Make | Suzuki | Ford |
Model | Fronte | Lynx |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 1595 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2620 mm |