1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Hummer H3
To start off, 2010 Hummer H3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,653 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Hummer H3 (239 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Hummer H3 weights approximately 1702 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Hummer H3 (327 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Hummer H3 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Hummer |
| Model | Fronte | H3 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 3653 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 239 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 327 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 2202 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 2170 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2850 mm |
