1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (414 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 396 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1198 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (529 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 497 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Suzuki | Ford |
| Model | Fronte | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 5000 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 414 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 32 Nm | 529 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1698 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4778 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 2035 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1425 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2720 mm |
