1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,013 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (370 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 352 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 1989 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (508 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 476 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
Make | Suzuki | Land Rover |
Model | Fronte | Range Rover Sport |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 2013 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 370 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 508 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 2489 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4783 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 2158 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2745 mm |