1963 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2013 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2013 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Pathfinder (256 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 1476 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Pathfinder (325 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2013 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Suzuki Fronte | 2013 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Suzuki | Nissan |
Model | Fronte | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 358 cc | 3500 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 1976 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 5009 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1961 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2900 mm |