1963 Triumph 2000 2.5 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, both 1963 Triumph 2000 2.5 and 1963 Triumph 2000 were released in the same year (1963). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 2.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 2.5 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000 . (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 2.5 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000 . With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 2.5 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000 . So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 2.5 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000 . (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 2.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000 .
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph 2000 2.5 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Triumph | Triumph |
Model | 2000 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.8 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |