1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 1997 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1997 Honda CR-V is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Honda CR-V weights approximately 330 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Honda CR-V (180 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 1997 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph 2000 | 1997 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Triumph | Honda |
Model | 2000 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1963 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 158 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 74.8 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.8 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |