1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 2009 Citroen C3
To start off, 2009 Citroen C3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 47 kg more than 2009 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C3 (161 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Triumph 2000 | 2009 Citroen C3 | |
| Make | Triumph | Citroen |
| Model | 2000 | C3 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 161 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.8 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 82 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1123 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 45 L |
