1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 2010 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2010 Kia Carnival is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,656 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Carnival (186 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Carnival should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Carnival weights approximately 854 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Carnival (246 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Carnival will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Triumph 2000 | 2010 Kia Carnival | |
| Make | Triumph | Kia |
| Model | 2000 | Carnival |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2656 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 186 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 246 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.8 mm | 86.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2024 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 80 L |
