1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Triumph 2000 | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Triumph | Mazda |
| Model | 2000 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2639 mm |
