1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 vs. 2009 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2009 Pagani Zonda is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pagani Zonda (594 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 490 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. (104 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Pagani Zonda weights approximately 215 kg more than 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Triumph Dove GTR4 | 2009 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Triumph | Pagani |
| Model | Dove GTR4 | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2138 cc | 7300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 594 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2055 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1141 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2730 mm |
