1963 Triumph Herald vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 545 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer (198 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph Herald | 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Triumph | Mitsubishi |
Model | Herald | Lancer |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1147 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4572 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1491 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 59 L |