1963 Volkswagen 1500 vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Volkswagen 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Jazz (77 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Jazz weights approximately 118 kg more than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Volkswagen 1500 | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Volkswagen | Honda |
Model | 1500 | Jazz |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 1245 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 77 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1048 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 42 L |