1964 Abarth 1000 GT vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1000 GT would be higher. At 1,244 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 175 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1000 GT.
Because 1964 Abarth 1000 GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1000 GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 1000 GT | 1981 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Abarth | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 1000 GT | Colt |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 635 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2310 mm |
