1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2003 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Neon weights approximately 1187 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 2003 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | Abarth | Dodge |
| Model | 2000 | Neon |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 101.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1857 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2670 mm |
