1964 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Silverado
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 627 kg more than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Silverado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Silverado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Silverado (386 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. (91 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2000 Chevrolet Silverado | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | Mono 1000 | Silverado |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 5733 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 91 Nm | 386 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 64 L |
