1964 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2012 BMW 640
To start off, 2012 BMW 640 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW 640 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2012 BMW 640 | |
| Make | Abarth | BMW |
| Model | Mono 1000 | 640 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 2979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 89.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 84 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4894 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1894 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1369 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2855 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |
