1964 Alpine A vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Mustang (256 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 907 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Alpine A | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A | Mustang |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1482 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 59 L |