1964 Austin Princess vs. 2009 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Patriot (148 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess.
Because 1964 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Jeep Patriot has automatic transmission and 1964 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1964 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Patriot will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 2009 Jeep Patriot | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | Princess | Patriot |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 148 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |