1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1951 Alfa Romeo 1900
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1951 Alfa Romeo 1900. (90 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1951 Alfa Romeo 1900. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 975 kg more than 1951 Alfa Romeo 1900. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 1951 Alfa Romeo 1900 | |
Make | Cadillac | Alfa Romeo |
Model | 62 | 1900 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1884 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |