1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1963 Mini MK I
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mini MK I would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1963 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1963 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1415 kg more than 1963 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1963 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mini |
| Model | 62 | MK I |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2040 mm |
