1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1995 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Thunderbird (230 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 471 kg more than 1995 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1604 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2950 mm |
