1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1995 Mazda 323
To start off, 1995 Mazda 323 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 323. (82 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 855 kg more than 1995 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1995 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | 323 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1686 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
