1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1998 Jaguar XK is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1998 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | 62 | XK |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |
