1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Ford Taurus X
To start off, 2008 Ford Taurus X is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Taurus X (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Taurus X should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 923 kg more than 2008 Ford Taurus X.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Ford Taurus X | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Taurus X |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1107 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 72 L |