1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Eagle Vision
To start off, 2000 Eagle Vision is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 505 kg more than 2000 Eagle Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Eagle Vision | |
| Make | Cadillac | Eagle |
| Model | 62 | Vision |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
