1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Lada 119
To start off, 2002 Lada 119 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2002 Lada 119. (76 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 119. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1025 kg more than 2002 Lada 119. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Lada 119 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lada |
| Model | 62 | 119 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |
