1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Citroen C5
To start off, 2003 Citroen C5 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C5. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 740 kg more than 2003 Citroen C5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Citroen C5 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
| Model | 62 | C5 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1749 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 66 L |
