1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Ford Freestyle
To start off, 2005 Ford Freestyle is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Freestyle (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Freestyle should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 165 kg more than 2005 Ford Freestyle.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Ford Freestyle | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Freestyle |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 72 L |
