1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Ford E-350
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 855 kg more than 2006 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 5407 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 12 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 132 L |
