1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2006 Rover 75. (175 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 845 kg more than 2006 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | 62 | 75 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 65 L |
