1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Ford Ka
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1188 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Ka |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 887 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 40 L |
