1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Commander (330 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 209 kg more than 2008 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | 62 | Commander |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 5654 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 330 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1866 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |
