1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 BMW 325
To start off, 2010 BMW 325 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 325 (215 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 535 kg more than 2010 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 BMW 325 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | 62 | 325 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1495 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 63 L |