1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Buick Regal
To start off, 2012 Buick Regal is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Buick Regal (220 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 410 kg more than 2012 Buick Regal.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Buick Regal | |
| Make | Cadillac | Buick |
| Model | 62 | Regal |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4831 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1857 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2738 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 68 L |
