1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 262 kg more than 2013 Dodge CHARGER.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | 62 | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1813 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 72 L |