1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Honda Odyssey
To start off, 2013 Honda Odyssey is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Odyssey (245 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Odyssey should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 72 kg more than 2013 Honda Odyssey.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Honda Odyssey | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | Odyssey |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3471 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2003 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5152 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2011 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1737 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3000 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |