1964 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2010 Mazda B2300 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 DKW Munga weights approximately 150 kg more than 2010 Mazda B2300.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda B2300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW Munga | 2010 Mazda B2300 | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | Munga | B2300 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2266 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 62 L |
