1964 Ford Falcon vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,890 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (123 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 645 kg more than 1964 Ford Falcon.
Because 2005 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Falcon (244 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (161 Nm). This means 1964 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford Falcon | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Falcon | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2890 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 161 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1345 kg |
