1964 Ford Zodiac vs. 1953 Ford Crestline
To start off, 1964 Ford Zodiac is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 0 more horse power than 1964 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Ford Crestline weights approximately 210 kg more than 1964 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford Zodiac | 1953 Ford Crestline | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Zodiac | Crestline |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 3929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2940 mm |
