1964 Holden EH vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1964 Holden EH is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Holden EH (100 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 95 kg more than 1964 Holden EH.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EH | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | EH | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2928 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2540 mm |
