1964 Holden EH vs. 2010 BMW 325
To start off, 2010 BMW 325 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 325 (194 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 325 (400 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2010 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 2010 BMW 325 | |
Make | Holden | BMW |
Model | EH | 325 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2928 cc | 2494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2770 mm |