1964 Holden EK vs. 2000 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2000 Subaru Forester is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Subaru Forester (123 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Subaru Forester (176 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EK. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2000 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Holden | Subaru |
| Model | EK | Forester |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
